The Origin of the American Quesenburys

Family Line Links: (WikiTree.com)(Ancestry.com)(FamilySearch.org)

Our recent Quesenbury ancestors were founding members and longtime residents of the humble city of Mulberry, Arkansas. The surname Quesenbury, however, has a surprisingly noble past. In its earliest form, it seems to have come from the surname Questenberg, which originated in the Harz mountains of ancient Saxony (now Brunswick, Germany). Berg is the German word for mountain, and Questen is assumed to be derived from the German word Quast, which means crest or tuft. Because the northern Harz mountains are mostly bare of trees, a peak with a few trees on it would likely have been called a Questenberg - i.e. a tufted mountain. And there is, in fact, a small village in the Harz region with this name that was first settled in the 5th-6th century BC.

The earliest known person of what would become the American branch of this line was a man by the name of Tielmann “Tidem” Questenberg from Lubeck, Germany. In 1418, Teilmann was a merchant of the Hanseatic League doing business in London. This commercial league of merchant guilds and market towns was instrumental to developing and defending trade routes across Northern Europe from the late 12th to 15th centuries. He was born in Bodenfeld, Germany (then called Bortfelde) in about 1380. In 1424, he applied for citizenship to Cologne, Germany and was accepted. (National citizenship in Germany was not well established until well into the 19th century.) He died in about 1446, leaving behind his widow, Sybella von Süchteln and an unknown number of children. Although the Cologne branch of the Questenberg tree later went extinct in 1797, Tielman was likely the common ancestor of all Questenbergs who lived there in the preceding 300+ years.

The only known son of Teilmann and Sybilla was Bertold Questenberg, born about 1420. In 1445, he married a Margareth, and purchased an estate in the commercial district of Cologne, which he named The Lily by the Bridge. This property was passed down through the family for many generations, until the year 1646, when it was declared as too “old, dilapidated and decayed” for continued habitation.

Cologne, Germany 1411

Bertold continued his father's work as a cloth merchant of the Hanseatic League stationed in London. He was also a member of the Cologne Senate for over 30 years. He and Margareth had 4 sons, the oldest of which, Henricus “Henry” Questenberg, was our direct ancestor (born abt 1446). As was traditional for eldest sons at the time, Henry was taken to London with his father to become a Hanse merchant and train in the cloth trade of his father. The Hanseatic League was committed to protecting its trade secrets from the English and as such had very strict rules regarding its members. Women were completely excluded from the communal London colony where they lived, as the confidences of females were not to be trusted. Members were not allowed to stay outside those quarters for even a single night. Consequently, men were at times cut off from their families for many years. Any man who made the mistake of marrying an English woman would immediately be expelled from the league with all of his trade rights forfeited.

Alas, this would be the fate of our ancestor Henry, who married for love to a woman named Catherine from Canterbury, Kent, England, in about 1467. In addition to losing his membership in the Hanseatic League, he was disowned and disinherited by his father and forced to leave London and settle down humbly in Canterbury with his new wife. It is here that the Questenberg surname makes its first change, as foreign names ending in '-berg' or '-burg' were often changed by English immigrants to the native English '-bury' or '-borough' endings. Thus, Henry’s son Augustine was given the surname Questenbury.

Canterbury, England

Augustine was born in Canterbury in about 1468, and began the family line’s long work of reestablishing themselves by opening a tailor shop in 1490. It is known that he had two sons, the oldest of which, John (born about 1493), was our direct ancestor. John’s trade is not known, but he was apprenticed to a William Warlowe. Next came his son Henry Questenbury, born in Canterbury in about 1517 and working as a shoemaker. It was in this generation that some of the prior family wealth began to reaccumulate, for Henry was able to purchase admittance to the freeman class, a distinction which could then be passed on to all future progeny by right of birth. As a freeman, he was no longer bound to the land as a serf, but instead allowed to take his trade where he pleased and sell in his own name. He would also have been allowed to vote in city affairs and respected as a man of substance.

Henry went on to have at least two sons, who took advantage of these new freedoms to settle outside of Canterbury. Henry Questenbury Jr., our direct ancestor, was born in about 1541 and settled with his wife Mildred first in the nearby town of Leeds Maidstone, and later in Rochester. They had 8 children, and by the time of Henry Jr.’s death in about 1606, they seem to have been quite well off, for he was able to pass on several homes and pieces of land to even his youngest son James (our ancestor).

James Questenbury, born in 1578, married a woman named Joan, also from Leeds and settled first in Bromley and later in (East) Greenwich, now a suburb of London. So it was that in 5 generations, the Questenburys had returned to their former status as wealthy traders in London. When he died there in 1620, James bequeathed all of his property and wealth to his eldest son John, with the stipulation that his younger son Thomas (our ancestor, born 1608) be paid 30 shillings annually from the rents of the land for the entirety of his life.

 
Unfortunately for Thomas, his father’s wishes were not carried out as expected. He died when Thomas was only 12 years old. His older brother John was 14, and so his mother was guardian over his father’s will until they reached adulthood at the age of 21. In 1624, however, Joan remarried to a John Griffin from Westminster, who went on to defraud his new wife’s former offspring (Ref 3, p46-49). In court documents from 1663, in which Thomas tried unsuccessfully to recover his due from the will, Thomas stated that after his father’s death, he was left with no one to care for him, and that as a minor was unable to force the tenants of the land to pay the rents that would provide the salary he was due. Thus, in 1624, at the age of only 16, he felt he was forced to make his way to America to try his fortune here instead. In his absence and unknown to him, in 1628 his step-father transferred the property that was to pay his lifelong salary into his name and sold it, keeping the profits for himself.

Thankfully for Thomas, and for our family line, the Virginia Company of London had a program in which they found boys of good character who were orphaned or neglected and sent them to America to learn one of the skilled trades that were so badly needed in the new world. Thomas Questenbury seems to have been selected for this program (Ref 3, p.47-49). He is the only Questenbury known to have come to America, and as such is the common ancestor of all American Questenbury’s, regardless of its myriad spellings. In fact, despite the Questenberg/Questenbury line having originated in Germany and existed for many years in England, by 1797 it had gone extinct in all but the American line. No doubt due, at least in some part, to the many offspring over the years who chose to join the clergy and live a life of celibacy.

Not long after arriving in the colonies, Thomas married a woman named Joane Jesse. They had two sons, John (our direct ancestor, born 1627) and Francis, and four daughters. Thomas must have been disappointed by his efforts in America though, because in 1650, his wife and their daughters (Sarah, Mildred, Joane, and Elizabeth) returned to Canterbury, England (see Note 1). There he set up shop as a shoemaker while pursuing the lawsuit mentioned previously alongside his sister Mildred. He died in about 1672 and may have been buried at or near the Church of St. Mary, Northgate where many of his other family members' graves are found.

His sons, however, then in their mid 20’s, chose to stay in Virginia (see Note 2). Francis never married and left no offspring. John married Anne Pope from a wealthy and well-known Royalist family. (Ann’s cousin, also named Ann Pope, married John Washington, the great grandfather of George Washington.) Due to these Royalist connections, things got a bit tense in the colonies for the Questenburys during the years of the English Civil War, 1642-1651, particularly after 1649 when King Charles I was executed. Perhaps this contributed to Thomas's decision to return to England. When the Fairfax Grant opened up the northern neck of Virginia for settlement, many Royalists supporters of King Charles II took advantage to resettle and form a new political center more loyal to the crown than those of the Puritans or Cromwellians.

Virginia’s Northern Neck

In 1651, John helped to survey the land in this area for what would later become Stratford Hall, the future home of General Lee in Westmoreland Co. (then Northumberland Co.). Then, in 1666, he was able to purchase land adjoining this estate. Interestingly, in 1656, when John signed for this land, he did not yet know how to read and write. He was later able to learn as an adult, but always spelled phonetically. It was this that caused the ‘t’ to be dropped from the surname Questenbury. Apparently the ‘t’ has always been silent, as shown by the fact that when written by members of the family it was present, but when written by others, it was usually absent. But at this point, John’s father was back overseas, and his brother Francis was illiterate. It was up to him to decide how it should be spelled and he spelled it like it sounded, Quesenbury. As time went on, his offspring often "Americanized" the -bury ending to be spelled as -berry instead.

John was known to have been an upright, devout, and trustworthy man. He and his family were members of the famous Pope’s Creek Episcopalian Church (now Baptist). Although there are no longer burial markers there from that long ago, it is assumed that this is where he and his family were buried. He was a farmer and a surveyor’s assistant, and if similar in stature to his father’s line, was likely very tall, as many of his male ancestors were said to have been over 6 ½ feet (clearly we didn't get that gene). He had three sons, John, William, and Humphrey. The oldest, John, died young and had no off-spring. The youngest, Humphrey, settled in KY and his line intermarried with the Pope family many times over the generations. The middle son, William, born about 1671, was our direct ancestor.

As the eldest living son, William (direct line, b.1672) inherited most of his father’s Westmoreland Co. land after his death in 1714. He married Eleanor Miner in 1699 and together they had 8 children before he passed at the age of 91. He was wealthy enough that in 1740 he gifted each of his 3 sons 50 acres of the land he owned, while still having many acres remaining. His third son, Nicolas (born about 1710), was our direct ancestor. Nicolas and his wife Rose McGill had son (see Note 3), also named Nicolas, born in about 1755. He married Elizabeth Pope, and together they set off for Wake Co, NC. where our 5th great grandfather, William Miner Quesenbury was born in 1777. Later, as the west opened, their off-spring would spread to TN, AR and TX as well.

Research Notes

(1) Some sources say that only John and Francis were born in VA and that Thomas remarried to a younger woman upon return to England (possibly Alice nee?) and the daughters were all born there. This conclusion seems to come from a lack of records proving the daughters were ever in America whereas records of their adult lives are found in England. (Ref 3, p.49-50, Ref 1, p.124). No records of their births seem to exist in either country though, and unless they were all born in Thomas's older age (42+ years), it seems more likely to me that at least some were born in VA around the same time as John and Francis. Though to be fair, many Quesenbury men seem to have fathered children into older age.

(2) It seems that John initially returned to England with his father in 1650, but was then sponsored by Richard Turney to return alone to Virginia in 1651 (Ref 6). Some researchers feel this voyage record means that Thomas never actually came to Virginia in 1624, and rather it was his son John (b.1627) who did, but not until 1651. It is true that 1651 is the first time at which John's presence in VA records is concretely found. However, it is by Thomas's own words in his court trial of 1663 that he describes himself as having been "forced to seek his fortunes and go beyond the seas, where he remained for many years" (Ref.3, p.48). So to me it makes the most sense that John was indeed born in VA in 1627 and left only briefly when his father relocated to England in 1650.

(3) There is much confusion among researchers as to the exact parentage of the Nicholas who lived in NC in 1777 and was the father of William Miner Q. One possibility, laid out in this article, was that he was the son of Nicholas (b. 1710) and Rose McGill. Nicholas (b.1755) was definitely the grandson of William Sr (b.1671), and is mentioned in his 1762 will (Ref 1, p.b128, Ref 5, p.124). Another possibility was that he was the son Nicholas (b. 1735) of his 2nd cousin William Jr (b. 1704) and Anne Pope. However, there is no mention of this Nicholas (b.1735) as having any son other than George (b.1785), who was born 20 years later than his supposed brother (Ref 1.,p.b133), whereas per family account, William Miner Q. (b. 1777) is supposed to have had several brothers (Ref 2, p.37). Additionally, Nicholas (b. 1735) removed his family to NC for only a time during the Rev War, after which there is a well documented trail of his return to VA and remarriage to Hannah (Ref. 1, p.b131). Nicholas, father of William M., seems to have settled in NC permanently (Ref. 2, p.35).

Another possibility is that Nicholas is really a son of John (b. 1700), though this Nicholas is supposed to have died in 1750 without male heirs (Ref. 1, p.b128). Finally, some researchers say he is the son of a John descended from the Humphrey line rather than William line. This certainly seems possible, though I have yet to find a John of that line that fits the time and place. (And can I just say that it doesn't help that they pretty much all had at least one child named Nicholas, William, and/or John). For now, I am following the conclusion that our Nicholas (b.1755) was the son of Nicholas (b. 1710) and Rose. But regardless of father, all Quesenburys in America descended from the original John b. 1627.

References

(1) Mayes, Edward. "Genealogical notes on a branch of the family of Mayes and on the related families of Chappell, Bannister, Jones, Peterson, Locke, Hardaway, Thweatt and others". Jackson, Ms. : Hederman Brothers, 1928, Chap. "The Quisenberry Family". https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/14899/ : 2022.

(2) Quisenberry, Anderson C. "Genealogical memoranda of the Quisenberry family and other families". Washington DC : Hartman & Cadick, Printers, 1897. https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/13482/ : 2022.

(3) Quisenberry, Anderson C. "Memorials of the Quisenberry family in England, Germany, and America". Washington DC : Gibson Bros., Printers & Bookbinders, 1900. https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/13484/ : 2022.

(4) Mackenzie, George Norbury, and Nelson Osgood Rhoades, editors. "Colonial Families of the United States of America: in Which is Given the History, Genealogy and Armorial Bearings of Colonial Families Who Settled in the American Colonies From the Time of the Settlement of Jamestown, 13th May, 1607, to the Battle of Lexington, 19th April, 1775". Vol. 1. 1912. Reprinted, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 1966, 1995. https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/61175/

(5) Payne, Brooke. "The Paynes of Virginia", p.124. Richmond, VA : William Byrd Press, 1937. https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/12187/images/dvm_GenMono001631-00073-0?pId=131 : 2022.

(6) "Early Virginia Immigrants, 1623–1666". John Quesenbury arrived by 1651, sponsored by Richard Turner.

The Maxeys of VA and KY

Family Line Links: (WikiTree.com)(Ancestry.com)(FamilySearch.org)

Edward Maxey of London, England came to VA colony in about 1690, possibly as an indentured servant of William Byrd (an elected representative of the VA House of Burgesses). During this time, he likely lived in Charles City County, VA, where William Byrd was building his Westover Plantation along the James River. In about 1695, his servitude would have ended, and it is then that he married Susannah Gates. Sometime after they moved to neighboring Henrico Co, VA. Like many farmers in VA at this time, they were slave owners.

Westover Plantation on St. James River

He and his wife had 8 children, 6 boys, 2 girls, the second youngest of which was our ancestor Sylvanus “Sill” Maxey. In 1725, Edward purchased land for the first time in what is now Powhatan Co, VA, just north of Hwy 60 between the towns of Plain View and Flat Rock. His oldest son Edward Jr. purchased adjoining land at the same time and by 1735 his sons Willam, Nathaniel, and John had also purchased land nearby. Sill and Walter, who would have been aged 17 and 16 at this time, were presumably still living with their parents. When Edward passed 5 years later in 1740, he left a 400-acre plot of land to be divided between Sill and Walter.

Sill married in 1736 to Mary Ester Worley from Goochland Co. (now Cumberland Co.), VA. Together they had 5 children before Mary passed away about 1747. The second youngest child was our ancestor, William Henry Maxey. After his wife Mary’s death, Sylvanus sold his property to his brother Walter and moved to Albemarle Co. (now Buckingham Co.), VA. He married again by 1748 to Elizabeth “Betsey” Langdon from Henrico Co, VA. They went on to have 8 more children. (Side note: Early County formation in Virginia is a mess. I recommend this site if you want to understand why the names keep changing.)

The character of Sill has been called into question by other researchers. It has been noted that while many of his siblings had names that were passed onto future generations many times over, no one seems to have been interested in naming their offspring after him. Additionally, in 1743, he was brought before the court by William Mayo for having “abused his negro on the road”. In his later years, he moved with his wife and son William to Prince Edward Co., VA, and passed away in 1770. This land was passed on to William when he died, though very little else as his “estate” was very small.

His son William H. also had a checkered past. He was first married in about 1774, aged 30, to Elizabeth Turbyfield. He was a soldier in both the French and Indian War in 1760 and the Revolutionary war in 1779. In 1780, he sold the Prince Edward Co. property and moved back to Buckingham Co. (previously Albemarle Co.). They had 7 children together, but then in 1796, William posted a notice in the Virginia Gazette stating that his wife had “absconded from him” and that “he does not mean she shall waste any more of his property”. (Note that divorce was not formalized in Virginia until 1803). Given what a difficult situation this would have left Elizabeth in, one has to wonder what was bad enough to make her leave in the first place.

Regardless, Willam H. remarried only a year later to another Elizabeth, this one with the maiden name Chambers. He and his second wife had only one child, our ancestor William Chambers Maxey. They soon uprooted and moved to Kentucky, which had opened for settlement in 1792. The area they settled was in Logan Co. (now Warren Co.), KY, a 188-acre farm along the Gasper River, near where it joins with the Barren River. At that time, it was required to live on the land for 3 years before being able to purchase it, which they finally accomplished in 1800. In 1819, when William C. was 21, his father sold him this land for $200 and he married Elizabeth “Ann” Simpson. They did not stay long though. As soon as his parents had both passed, between 1824 and 1832, they sold the land. It is possible they moved to Bowling Green, KY for a time.

They are next found in the records in 1838, living just north of Mulberry, Crawford, AR (which later became part of Franklin Co.). This area began to be rapidly settled by Whites in 1828 after the Cherokee Native Americans were moved westward by a treaty. The area was called Mulberry due to the many Mulberry trees that grew along the river there. William C. is said to have been a well-respected early settler of the town. William C. and Ann had 12 children before she passed in 1853 at the age of 55. Her 4th child was our 4th great grandmother, Eliza Jane Maxey. According to the 1860 census, they owned 7 slaves. After Ann died, William C. remarried to a much younger Mary Larrimore (Scott) and had one more child.

Eliza Maxey stayed in Mulberry and married Richard Quesenbury from TN when she was 21. They owned 5 slaves up until the civil war, after which the census reported two young black girls who “worked in the home”. They had 3 children, all of whom also settled in Franklin Co., AR. Albert, the eldest, is our direct ancestor, and was a successful merchant and part owner of the drug store Quesenbury and Counts. His family line remained in Mulberry, AR for many years.

Sources

Edythe Maxey Clark, "The Maxey's of Virginia", 3rd Ed, A Genealogical History of the Descendants of Edward and Susannah Maxey. Baltimore, MD : Gateway Press, Inc., 2000.

Virginia Parish Maps. http://wvancestry.com/ReferenceMaterial/Files/Virginia_Parish_Maps.pdf : accessed 2022.

History of Franklin County. https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/7931/images/HistBenton-AR-0606640?pId=1276

The Kent Family’s Journey West

Family Line Links: (WikiTree.com)(Ancestry.com)(FamilySearch.org)

Our Kent family from England came to America in the mid-1600s, likely as part of the Puritan Great Migration that sent roughly 40,000 people to America’s northeastern shores. The family settled first in Bristol County, MA, and then in Stafford, Tolland, CT for many years. However, after the Revolutionary War ended and the west became open to settlement, many families chose to leave the crowded cities of the northeast and try for greener pastures in the wide-open west. All but one of the Kent family siblings (Almeda, who seems to have died shortly after her marriage in 1829), became a part of this movement when they set out for the Northwest Territory in the early-mid 1830s. Based on census records, the parents do not seem to have joined them on this journey, although there are conflicting records to this fact.

Historical Background

Up until the early 1800s, the vast majority of people living in Indiana were Native American, with the Potawatomi and Miami indigenous peoples its most predominant residents. In 1783, the Treaty of Paris released claim of the Northwestern Territory from the French to the British Colonists. While the French had been mainly interested in trade with the Native Americans and thus had had mostly peaceful relations, the colonists wanted land, which the Native Americans were not interested in ceding. Many bloody battles ensued, and for a time, white settlement of this area was hindered by these dangers.

Finally, in 1830, President Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act, and on Aug 5, 1836, he used its power to issue a two-year ultimatum directing the Indians to "willingly" leave their land for west of the Mississippi river, or be forcefully removed. While many did finally give up and leave, on Sept 4, 1838, the remaining 850 Potawatomi who had not left were forcibly marched under armed guard to Kansas. This march proved deadly for many, particularly the children. But while disastrous for the Native Americans, white settlers from the east were now free to move westward without hindrance. It was during this period that the Kent siblings left CT for LaGrange Co., Indiana.

Map depicting the traditional range of Native American homelands before the 1834

Depiction of The Trail of Tears by Max D. Standley

Two advances in US transportation made this journey possible. The first was the National Road, which started in MD and reached Indiana in1829. Unlike the 5 wagon routes that were the only previous way through the Appalachian Mountains, the National Road was constructed with stone, which did not quickly deteriorate to the impassable conditions of the previous dirt routes.

Second was the Erie Canal, which opened in 1825, and connected eastern Troy, NY with Lake Erie in western Niagara Co., NY. This route created a much cheaper and faster travel option to the Northwestern Territory than by road and led more directly to the northern portion of the state. In also opened up The West to more much profitable trade and commerce.




It is not known for certain which route the Kent siblings took on their journey west, but given its advantages, the Erie canal seems likely. Rivers were still the major mode of long-distance transportation at that time. Their father, Elijah, was said to have been a merchant as well as a farmer, so he likely would have dealt with shipping goods by this route. Additionally, Kensell Kent is said to have lived in NY for a time before his journey west, and may have been familiar with the new canal's workings.

Another factor encouraging westward movement was the Land Act of 1820, which modified the Land Ordinance of 1785 to lower the price of land from $2.00 per acre to $1.25 per acre. It also reduced the minimum allowed plot size from 160 to 80 acres. The price had to be paid in full at the time of purchase, but the overall payment was less than a third as expensive, making it more financially possible for the average settler to pursue. Nearly all settlers came because they had heard that Indiana had abundant, cheap, and fertile land. Like many early settlers though, the Kent siblings seem to have squatted on their new land for a few years before outright purchasing, because the date of their settlements in records differs from the date of their land purchases in most cases by 2-3 years.




Kent Family Line

The Kent siblings seem to have come to the Northwest Territory in separate groups, and upon their arrival spread out in a few different directions. The oldest son, Merril, arrived by 1830, which was before LaGrange Co. was organized in 1832. He purchased land a bit southeast of where the other siblings would be, first in Rush Co. and later Randolph Co.. Kensell and Orvin are said to have arrived by 1833, and Elijah may have come at this time as well. All 3 established claims in Eden Township, LaGrange Co.. According to the obituary of Achsah Kent (Frink), she set out for Indiana in 1836, and was likely accompanied by her youngest brother Enoch. Achsah settled in neighboring Noble County. Enoch, the youngest son, also eventually settled in Noble Co., but initially tried his luck in St. Joseph Co., MI, which was just over the state border from LaGrange.

 

 

Although Orvin, (our direct ancestor, b.1808), did lay claim in Eden over part of 1833, he only visited this residence off and on for the first decade. By 1834, Orvin had continued on to Ohio where he taught school in Monroe Co, OH. In addition to farming, Orvin had been teaching since he was 16 years old, and had attended one term of college at the Wesleyan Academy in Wilbraham, MA before coming west.

The Tweedy family, newly immigrated from Ireland in 1819, was also living in OH during this time (in Butler Co.), so this must have been where Orvin and his wife Grizella Tweedy met. They were a family of farmers as well. Grizella and Orvin married in 1840, and in 1847 Orvin retired from teaching and took his growing family back to Eden, LaGrange, IN to permanently settle. Their property was on the east township line, and both he and his son Robert bought adjoining property in neighboring Clearspring Co. as well.


Eden & Clearspring Twps, 1874



The SE portion of Eden Twp. where Kensell, Achsah, Elijah, and Orvin settled was named Haw Patch (now Topeka), due to the abundant number of Hawthorn trees in the area, a sign of excellent soil for farming. The land at this time was almost entirely forested, and it took many hard years to clear with the simple hand axes available to the early settlers. As it was cleared, accounts say it initially became choked with weeds, and birds ate much of the grain before it was harvested. But slowly the land was tamed, and soon the settlers were reaping profitable harvests.

Corn grew well in Indiana and initially became the most important crop and staple of their diets. Women used it to make everything from corn pone flatbread to corn mush porridge and even corn whiskey. They worked in the kitchen area of the rough log cabin homes settlers constructed during this early period. These were simple structures latched together without nails and closed tight from the wind with clay and mud. The floors were dirt, with a chimney and hearth at one end of the room, and a door and perhaps window along another wall. Over time, as development of the new community continued, homes and public buildings were upgraded to more modern clapboard and brick constructions.

The initial settlers of LaGrange County were mostly Yankee immigrants from New England like the Kent’s. In 1832, one year before the Kent’s arrived, the Robert Latta family became the first white settlement of Eden Township. Shortly after, William McConnell, with his wife and children built a log cabin south of the Lattas. Robert Latta was a Whig and a Methodist, while McConnell was a Democrat and a Presbyterian. This seems to have set up some early rivalry in land interests, religion, and politics that were a part of town life ever after.

The first church organized was a Methodist Episcopal church, meeting in the home of Robert Latta. In 1842, its congregation built a small frame church with an accompanying cemetery on Latta land and named it Eden Chapel. Orvin and Grizella, along with many of their children were buried in this cemetery, so it is likely they attended Methodist services as well (although in later years Orvin described himself as part of the little-known Swedenborgian Church). The first Amish Mennonite church was organized in 1854, and the Amish community continues to be a strong presence in the area today.

The original roads of Eden Twp. were nothing more than old Native American trails and animal paths through the wilderness. These narrow paths primarily ran NE to SW to avoid the swamps, and were “so snugly lined by sunflowers and stinging nettle, as high as a man’s head, that travel was not at all pleasant.” In most cases at this time, townships were expected to fund and build road infrastructure for themselves. And according to town records, Orvin Kent was called upon to help in this effort. The township section line north of his home became the starting location for one of the first roads in Eden Twp, Sycamore Road, and its intersection with Haw Patch Rd became known as Sycamore corners due to a large Sycamore tree once growing there.

House & Farm of Orvin Kent at Sycamore Corners, 1893

The 1840 census found that less than one-quarter of Indiana children between the ages of five and fifteen attended school. Additionally, about one in seven adults could not read or write. Until the 1850s, schools were locally created and funded by the townships, not the state. The Kent siblings appear to have played important roles in assisting Eden township with developing its education system. Within Eden township, Kensell Kent organized the first school in 1834. It was in a log cabin a half mile west of what was then known as Denny’s Corner’s. Achsah Kent (Frink) was one of the earliest teachers at this school. Additionally, Orvin Kent donated land at Sycamore Corners to both the Sycamore Literary Society, which was founded in 1879, and the Sycamore Schoolhouse. The society’s original secretary was Emanuel Stutzman, the father of Magdalena Stutzman, who Orvin’s son Robert married in 1870.

As settlement in the west further expanded, many residents of LaGrange began to move on to new areas full of promise yet again. Between 1850-1870, Kensell, Merrill, Achsah, and Elijah all left Indiana to resettle in IA and IL. Only Enoch, in nearby Noble Co., and Orvin, in LaGrange Co., stayed for the long haul. Orvin and his wife Grizella had 7 children, 3 of whom stayed in the Hawpatch area, including his son Robert, who is our direct ancestor. Orvin’s original land purchase was divided between these 3 children, with him keeping a small 20 acre plot for he and his wife to continue farming.

Sources

1) James H. Madison, and Lee Ann Sandweiss, and Jane Hedeen. Hoosiers and the American Story. Indianapolis, Indiana : Indiana Historical Society Press, 2014, Chap 1 and 3. https://indianahistory.org/wp-content/uploads/Hoosiers-and-the-American-Story-Full-Text.pdf : 2022.

2) Frederick J. Turner. The American Historical Review 11:2 (January, 1906): 303-327. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1834646 : 2022.

3) Herick, J. H. ; Goodspeed, Weston A. Counties of La Grange and Noble, Indiana: Historical and Biographical, Volume 1. Chicago, Il. : F. A. Battey and Co. Publishers, 1882, pp.205, 382-383, and Chap. 10 and 12. https://indianamemory.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p1819coll6/id/9137 : 2022.

4) Topeka Area Historical Society. The Kent's of Hawpatch. Mile 146 6:1, 2013. https://topekahistoricalsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2013-Jan.pdf?189db0&189db0 : 2022.

5) Topeka Area Historical Society. Memorable Moments in Topeka History. 2017. https://topekahistoricalsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Memorable-Moments-in-Topeka-History.pdf?189db0&189db0 : 2022.

6) LaGrange Publishing Company. Illustrated atlas and Columbian souvenir of La Grange County, Indiana : showing its development in the first sixty years since organization. LaGrange, IN : LaGrange Pub. Co., 1893. https://www.loc.gov/resource/g4093lm.gla00090/?sp=3&r=-0.172,0.146,1.364,0.572,0 : 2022.

7) D P Kayner. An Illustrated Historical Atlas of Lagrange County, Indiana, 1874: Map Work of Townships and Plats. Baskin, Forster & Co. Lakeside Building Chicago, 1876. http://www.historicmapworks.com/Atlas.php?cat=Maps&c=US&a=8148 : 2022.

Welcome!

Welcome to my Family History blog! This website is intended to be a place to collect and share the information and stories I find as I deep dive into a particular family line of my genealogy. I really like to understand the political, economic, and emotional factors that helped shape the lives of people from prior time periods. 

Although not a historian by trade, my prior work as a PhD biophysical chemist provides me with professional research/publication expertise, and I have been exploring my family history for over 35 years now. I attempt to use credible sources and to apply a critical eye to the information I collect. However, I cannot guarantee the accuracy of everything I post here, and it will be a work in progress. Regardless, I will try to list my sources so that you can further verify on your own. I rely on Wikipedia a lot for links to general historical topics that readers may need to refresh on in order to better understand the context I am discussing.

Of note, I also do not post much in the way of specific birth/death/marriage dates in this material. I think services like FamilySearch.org, Wikitree.com, and Ancestry.com do a better job of that than I could, and I try to provide links to my information on those within the text. You can find most of my sources for these documents on Ancestry.com as well. Of note, if you are having trouble navigating the side on a phone or tablet, try using the "switch to web version" option at the bottom of the page.

If you find that you are related in some way, and/or have information of your own to share, I would love to hear from you! (evelynvigdahl@gmail.com)

Family Line Links: (WikiTree.com)(Ancestry.com)